What did we know and when did we know it?

We already knew masks didn't work against viruses, and the vaccine creation time was way too short.

There has been a call for “amnesty” from The Atlantic about covidiots blindly trusting the science. But the article had nothing approaching an apology, they were just trying to avoid any personal responsibility in their anti-science actions. This article will explore their likely excuses and my response. Their claims were “we just didn’t know” which is false. They were willfully ignorant, which is also criminal negligence.

“We were just following orders.”

So were the Nazis. That’s not an excuse to be anti-science. These covidiots didn’t even do a basic search for studies, which are free on https://pubmed.gov and other sites. And there are more links to free studies below.

“We didn’t know masks didn’t work to stop a virus.”

Yes we did, from studies about flu way before 2019.

1. Fauci knew in 2008 that masks cause more problems than they fix. He did the study! But he continued to recommend masks, although inconsistently. 2008 STUDY: Bacterial pneumonia caused more deaths in 1918 than Spanish flu, probably from wearing masks. https://wordsalad.info/2020/12/1918-flu-autopsies-reveal-that-bacterial-pneumonia-caused-more-deaths-than-the-flu-itself/ and https://archive.ph/d2wC2

2. There are more studies done on how masks won’t stop a virus here as time went on during actual COVID-19.

“We didn’t know the vaccine didn’t work.”

We had very strong suspicions it was a high risk vaccine because this new mRNA vaccine technology takes 10+ years to develop and test. This one was rolled out in 1 year. That’s a big red flag which was systematically ignored by the anti-science sheeple. The mRNA technology was a new technology, one that was never tested on humans before 2020.

“We didn’t know hydroxychloriquine worked against COVID-19.”

Yes we did. Here are some studies, the first was before COVID-19 (SARS-COV-2).

1. SARS-COV-1 is similar enough to SARS-COV-2, which means HCQ must be investigated as a treatment, and it was. But first, August 22, 2005, there is a study on "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS(-COV-1) coronavirus infection and spread." It's in the "Virology Journal" the official publication of CDC. That's why Democrat governors, and only Democrat governors, banned HCQ to treat SARS-COV-2. Here is the study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/ and https://archive.ph/KHLFR Citation: Vincent MJ, Bergeron E, Benjannet S, Erickson BR, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, Seidah NG, Nichol ST. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol J. 2005 Aug 22;2:69. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69. PMID: 16115318; PMCID: PMC1232869. One scientist on this study was associated with the CDC.

2. 2020-03-19. Chloroquin study, 100% cured when used with antibiotic azythromycin. (The antibiotic is used to stop secondary in bacterial infections.) https://drive.google.com/file/d/186Bel9RqfsmEx55FDum4xY_IlWSHnGbj/view

3. Here are more studies on many substances being tested against COVID-19 including HCQ. https://c19early.org/

4. More studies on HCQ here. https://wordsalad.info/tag-hcq.html

5. Why would Michigan Gov Whitmer ban HCQ unless she knew it could work against COVID-19? In Michigan HCQ was banned for use against COVID-19, although HCQ is used for other things. If a pharmacist filled a prescription of HCQ for COVID-19 they would lose their license. Now Democrat Gov. Whitmer is being investigated for exceeding her emergency powers.

“We didn’t know Ivermectin worked against COVID-19.”

Yes we did. The studies were being done as we went along. It worked, it was cheap, it’s been around a long time, there are very few side effects, and it worked WELL. Ivermectin was demonized by covidiots.

1. Here are more studies on many substances being tested against COVID-19 including Ivermectin. https://c19early.org/

2. More studies here. https://wordsalad.info/tag-ivermectin.html

More links to study sites

These are more links to study sites with free studies.

1. https://pastebin.com/2vGVq05X List of links.

2. Pubmed, run by US NIH. https://pubmed.gov

3. BioMedCentral. A pioneer in open publishing. https://www.biomedcentral.com/

4. Elsevier open science. https://www.elsevier.com/about/open-science

5. Medrxiv. https://www.medrxiv.org/

6. Public Library of Science. https://www.plos.org/