So it would seem you are correct that whatever Spanish Flu was it would likely have been sequenced. Like you I believe bacterial pneumonia was likely the big killer in 1918, although I am not a science scholar.
And didn’t the WHO change the definition of ‘pandemic’ much to the consternation of researchers?
The word ‘pandemic’ carries baggage that was critical to pulling off this BS.
I used to follow John Cullen. In early days he pointed out how the CDC and NIH lied about annual P&I annual deaths. He used numbers from coroners and medical examiners which were much higher.
Cullen presumed the CDC and NIH decided (a) if people knew how many Americans died annually from flu Big Pharma couldn’t pretend their yearly flu shots were even remotely effective. And (b) if Americans knew the true extent of annual pneumonia deaths the deaths labeled ‘from or with Covid’ wouldn’t seem as staggering and scary.
Fauci's study showed clearly that bacterial pneumonia killed the majority of people out of the people/samples they studied for the 1918 flu. However it's possible the flu weakened their immune systems. The pneumonia would have been secondary to the flu. Which is why cutting edge doctors also prescribed antibiotics to people with COVID, to stop secondary bacterial infections, like bacterial pneumonia.
It is funny that doctors tended most of my life to say ‘it’s a flu. Go home and rest and drink fluids.’ Most of us recovered but in hindsight maybe people whose flu turned into or was bacterial pneumonia were behind the 8 ball not getting antibiotics sooner.
What’s crazy is this is basically the way the ‘dread pandemic’ was handled. Stay home isolate no meds until you are at death’s door and then we will be glad to juice you with remdesivir and or ventilate you.
My idea of a pandemic is when people are lying dead in the streets from the illness, so many that the medical personnel can't keep up - sort of like that movie "Contagion". Maybe my definition is wrong. Just my opinion.
You're not wrong. When I actually tried to find definitions of "pandemic" there was not a single definition which contained a numeric value, at that time, like 10% of the population is sick. That was the odd part. They were playing fast and loose with the definition so they could define it on the fly for their own purposes of manipulation.
That's why I bought an old dictionary because I'd heard that definitions of certain words like "vaccine" were being changed in the web. Just out of curiosity I looked up "pandemic" in my dictionary but it just had a very brief description: "a disease prevalent over a whole country or the world". I don't think that's a good description. IMO, a pandemic is something where, as I said, a lot of people (ie most of the population) are dropping dead or are seriously ill. P.S. my dictionary's definition of "vaccine" is "a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and procure IMMUNITY from a disease" (caps are mine).
Correct. A vaccine helps a person get immunity but normally it's only partial immunity. A single person achieving total immunity from a vaccine is rare.
Have you seen this?
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/reconstruction-1918-virus.html
So it would seem you are correct that whatever Spanish Flu was it would likely have been sequenced. Like you I believe bacterial pneumonia was likely the big killer in 1918, although I am not a science scholar.
And didn’t the WHO change the definition of ‘pandemic’ much to the consternation of researchers?
https://www.virology.ws/2009/05/23/who-will-redefine-pandemic/
The word ‘pandemic’ carries baggage that was critical to pulling off this BS.
I used to follow John Cullen. In early days he pointed out how the CDC and NIH lied about annual P&I annual deaths. He used numbers from coroners and medical examiners which were much higher.
Cullen presumed the CDC and NIH decided (a) if people knew how many Americans died annually from flu Big Pharma couldn’t pretend their yearly flu shots were even remotely effective. And (b) if Americans knew the true extent of annual pneumonia deaths the deaths labeled ‘from or with Covid’ wouldn’t seem as staggering and scary.
Fauci's study showed clearly that bacterial pneumonia killed the majority of people out of the people/samples they studied for the 1918 flu. However it's possible the flu weakened their immune systems. The pneumonia would have been secondary to the flu. Which is why cutting edge doctors also prescribed antibiotics to people with COVID, to stop secondary bacterial infections, like bacterial pneumonia.
It is funny that doctors tended most of my life to say ‘it’s a flu. Go home and rest and drink fluids.’ Most of us recovered but in hindsight maybe people whose flu turned into or was bacterial pneumonia were behind the 8 ball not getting antibiotics sooner.
What’s crazy is this is basically the way the ‘dread pandemic’ was handled. Stay home isolate no meds until you are at death’s door and then we will be glad to juice you with remdesivir and or ventilate you.
My idea of a pandemic is when people are lying dead in the streets from the illness, so many that the medical personnel can't keep up - sort of like that movie "Contagion". Maybe my definition is wrong. Just my opinion.
You're not wrong. When I actually tried to find definitions of "pandemic" there was not a single definition which contained a numeric value, at that time, like 10% of the population is sick. That was the odd part. They were playing fast and loose with the definition so they could define it on the fly for their own purposes of manipulation.
That's why I bought an old dictionary because I'd heard that definitions of certain words like "vaccine" were being changed in the web. Just out of curiosity I looked up "pandemic" in my dictionary but it just had a very brief description: "a disease prevalent over a whole country or the world". I don't think that's a good description. IMO, a pandemic is something where, as I said, a lot of people (ie most of the population) are dropping dead or are seriously ill. P.S. my dictionary's definition of "vaccine" is "a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and procure IMMUNITY from a disease" (caps are mine).
Correct. A vaccine helps a person get immunity but normally it's only partial immunity. A single person achieving total immunity from a vaccine is rare.
In the case of the covid "vaccìne", it seems those who are vaxxed are getting no immunity at all but in fact, quite the opposite.
Yes Anna and just think if that had been the case there would not be the need to keep beating this drum and trying to stifle information.