17 Comments

The Nuremberg Code, which we never signed away from, is law. So is Informed Consent. There was Absolutely nothing of the kind for that fakejab. The contents were a secret.

Then there’s the Hippocratic Oath... wherever it went...

Expand full comment

I forgot to mention, that Informed Consent was removed during the Obama years for experimental medical products. This was how the vaccines were forced on people. Along with the lies that the FDA gave "full approval" to the COoVID-19 vaccine in August 2021, when it did not. (I read the FDA memo then did a text search for similar terms.)

Expand full comment

Hmm then legal challenges to injectors of the poison will likely fail. Part of the globalist plan. Wonderful. Obama, such a man 4 the people.

Expand full comment

Can you share a link or two that shows how the Nuremburg code is law in the US? Or another country?

Expand full comment

Shouldn’t be hard to search.. this was something taught. So as i state that, my bs protector kicks in and suggests a tad of healthy skepticism. We(I) may be guilty of assuming alot. Often a judge has to decide whether, like a common old tune, it’s public domain, or, a newer, copyrighted item. Or whether an idea or fact is accepted as truth, like the earth is spherical. And it can be supported by facts/observations.

Perhaps 72+ countries didn’t sign on to controls for human experimentation and the evil ones can just go for it like Mengele did. That’s the practical end of all this: not only is an experimental unproven jab accepted in emergency, its ok to also shelf the legal standard of informed consent. There was surely none of that; the contents were kept secret but were, of course”safe and effective”. Makes the Nuremberg point moot , doesn’t it?

Expand full comment

Ok searched it. The Code wasn’t law nor cited ( due partly to lack of opportunity it states) until 1973. It only became legal precedent. Which, like law, can guide courts but not necessarily oblige them. I’m no lawyer. But in healthcare, we were constantly subject to journal articles relying on the Code as ethically binding us to do appropriate and “code-consistent” research before adopting new technics or materials or drugs. Again, its something that was so assumed, as to have me think it was law. Evidently, it was not despite its guiding usefulness. So, skirting around it in a so-called Emergency was not a factor in the WH’s operation warp speed.

Expand full comment

Thanks. I figured it was precedent, and piece of paper with signatories, the paper of which indicates an intention. A bunch of countries signed on to it, but it didn't actually become a law. It's like a Senate (or House) resolution. It is not a law but shows the intention of the majority of the Senate (or House).

Expand full comment

Then, the question becomes”how useful is it in that seat of 20th century historical evil, middle and eastern Europe?”

Expand full comment

The Nuremburg agreement is a guideline, not enforceable, and only useful as a guideline, as a source of arguments for the prosecution.

Expand full comment

We are still awaiting a trial along the Nurnberg Code, referring to Dr Fuellmich´s endeavours of course. In the meantime all lawsuits and trials of medical personnel, authorities, massmedia and the like are extraordinary and utterly brave examples to be followed and also helpful forerunners to the final revelation of this unprecedented attack on humanity.

Expand full comment

Here's what I found.

2021-1101. Team of 1,000 lawyers and 10,000 Medical Experts Start Nuremberg 2 Trial against World Leaders for Crimes Against Humanity. https://www.marktaliano.net/team-of-1000-lawyers-and-10000-medical-experts-start-nuremberg-2-trial-against-world-leaders-for-crimes-against-humanity/

2022-0106. Reiner Fuellmich gives an update on what's happening with the Nuremberg 2.0 trial. The Parliamentary hearing in Poland is wrapping up and the criminal trial for Crimes Against Humanity is set to begin in just a couple of weeks. Fuellmich outlines how the Covid-Crime Against Humanity is a deliberate and premeditated mass-murder... https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZUsdrbu3ne36/

2022-0825. To Fauci and others. Nuremberg code trials start jan 2023. crimes against humanity. Laws were changed specifically to control the population. Just 1 minute. https://www.bitchute.com/video/qfEhs3iUoQ9o/

Expand full comment

Thanks a lot - I have really been waiting for Dr Fuelmich`s the Nuremberg Trial. I know the Grand Jury has long been all set, but not the actual Trial starting. I suppose in the States since Dr Fuellmich found the German/European courts all corrupt. Sweden does not even have one. If you hear anything more about some of the labbs now working in Sweden please tell me, and vice versa? Part of the massmurdering, I suppose. What times we are having, no wonder the young ones dispare!

But you and Dr Malone and Jessica Rose sure shine among others and help keeping spirits up!

Expand full comment

> But you and Dr Malone and Jessica Rose sure shine among others and help keeping spirits up!

Well thank you! That's very nice.

If I hear anything I will make a post about it. Stay tuned.

Expand full comment

I believe the trial has already started, and might be finished. It was not an official trial in any official court, it was a "peoples' trial" to discover facts and players. This is not immediate gratification that most people wanted. However delayed gratification has its uses. The final change in getting rid of corrupt, incompetent gov't drones must ultimately come from the people themselves, or there will be no real change.

Expand full comment

thank you!

Expand full comment

I may also tell you all, that Sweden now is welcoming WHO:s new Treaty etc. Welcome at that, as is our rule with all of EU mandates....Sickening!

Sweden also has the chairmanship for the next six months and supposedly will do its best to convince the other EU- members in the same direction, as well as we will probably send new attackplanes in order to attack our old, huge and nuclear neighbour. Lost our heads?

Expand full comment

> Sweden now is welcoming WHO:s new Treaty

Well that's not good. More authoritarianism is coming next.

Expand full comment